Yakkstr

Keystone Pipeline Rejected

For now the Keystone Pipeline has been canceled.

For those of you who haven't followed the story here's a breif summary. A Canadian company called Transcanada wants to build a pipeline from Canada down to Texas, 1700 miles worth of pipe that would bring 830k barrels of oil into the US everyday. Fox News and the IEA estimate we will use a fifteen year low of 18 million gallons per day in 2012 just to put this in some kind of perspective. And create thousands of jobs throughout the country.

Last year Nebraska's own Governor, a Republican asked Obama to nix the pipeline.

The Obama administration has offered to let Transcanada apply for a different route. The last official route traveled almost directly over the Ogalla Aquifer which currently provides nearly one fourth of the crop water in America. There are debates as to how dangerous a leak would actually have been along the pipeline, and other various dangers that already threaten the underground water source but many people (including large majorities in Nebraska) felt that this was something important to stop and force to find a safer route.

I'd be shocked if the Pipeline is ultimately canceled, right now it was canceled primarily because it was attached to both a tax cut, a shrinking of unemployment benefits, and a shrinking of the EPA but I'd wager it'll be back. Just a matter of when.

report |
starchini said 4 months ago ...

I dont like this Julene Bair person. Comparing some nitrates from pesticides is equal to injecting lord knows how many gallons of oil directly in it, the oil would be a bazillion time worse and inevitable. I got the feeling she thought Nebraskans were being hypocrites. What a little bitch. Personally its kind of a duh to me. Pesticides are a necessary evil and she is off her rocker if she thinks we can grow our badass corn without the aquifer. I've been through Kansas and know what they consider a corn crop, its pathetic. Yes pesticides are really bad but they also benefit us greatly, the oil would too but not over the aquifer, it was totally an unecessary risk. Just move it over a few damn miles dang.

Oh and the big picture...Nebraska is made up of 90% republicans (wild guess but prolly pretty accurate) Republicans LOVE oil, so what would be the one thing that would get Nebraskan Republicans to go against oil? Oh I know, threaten to destroy the aquifer that sustains their entire way of life. Not in a million years would they have stopped that oil unless they were certain the aquifer was in danger.

I also resent that authors comparison of Nebraska and Kansas, not even close.

The ground water is merely 18 inches below the surface in many areas of the sandhills. Generally oil spills are large not small and even a small would could be disasterous if it made it to the aquifer. Much more than pesticides.

alienated said 4 months ago ...

Wonder what the argument is against using oil tankers to transport the oil from
Canada to Texas until something can be done with the pipeline? I am sure there
is some lame excuse for not doing that either. I heard someone say that it would
be a whole different story if the pipeline ended in some South American armpit
country. I am sure Obama would be all for that. It has to make you wonder.
I also heard a guy on the Rusty Humphreys radio show last night talking about
CNG (compressed natural gas). It would be nothing (under $2000 per vehicle)
to convert all government vehicles to CNG. That would pump millions back into
the U.S. economy because it costs about half as much to use CNG as regular
gasoline. And, according to people on that show, the emmissions from CNG 
are so low they cannot even be measured. But, instead, Obama loans millions 
of dollars to vaporware places like Celindra. You know, I am one of those
"rich" Republicans (not), but seriously I can pay $3 plus a gallon because about
all I use is what I use to go to work, which is not that much. But some of those
poor folks that Obama pretends to represent cannot. Not to mention hundreds
(thousands?) of them could use a job. Going through Nebraska (57% voted for
McCain in 2008) may not be the answer, but Obama would do well to come up
with a quick alternative. Crap like this is going to get him thrown out on his
ear because the Republicans could run a monkey and that monkey would make
better (and faster) decisions than Obama. And, no offense, but I do not believe
people who love oil are strictly Republican. I am sure most of them would 
convert to CNG if the EPA and the feds would make it a little more appealing,
like make sure that there would be CNG available at more service stations.
But that is not likely. Obama's handlers in the Middle East do not want us to
be energy independent. I would also like to see a believable report on who
the big oil companies contribute to. My bet would be Republicans. Both sides
play politics and we, the people, suffer for it. Well, you, the "poor" people
probably suffer more, which is all the more baffling why you keep voting
for dipwads like Obama who cares more for his political future than he does
for the future of America. Sure, do it right, but to it a hell of a lot faster. 
Pretend you are coming up with a bomb that will end the war. 

sean_renaud said 4 months ago ...

Obama didn't reject boats. At all. Considering we take boats from the Middle East it's safe to assume that boats were for whatever reason not on the table.

Even according to your decidedly non source it would take 2k per vehicle to convert to natural gas. Are you volunteering for the tax hike for that? (I personally doubt that includes jets, aircraft carriers or anything military or refueling anything military but still we'll let your number slide unless you can defend that point. And yes, I am prepping the goal posts to be moved on the off chance you have a point to make.)

In 2013 you better help me fix America. Cus by then I'll be quite tired of your crap.

Join our friendly Yakkstr community in 1 Easy Step
  • Meet Like Minded People
  • Share your thoughts with others who share your interests
  • No assholes to deal with, we keep them out
Join Now by writing your first comment below


Related Posts
Keystone Pipeline has Been ReRouted! Go Heineman!
Remember when I was blabbing about the pipeline a couple months ago and no one seemed to give a hoot? Well turns out I was just a little too close to the story, but finally the rest of the country has caught up cause Governor Heineman has successfully
5 comments
last by sean_renaud 6 months ago
Obama's Keystone Political Mess
Will Obama play the Keystone pipeline card when he is in trouble? I can understand a need to delay such a project based on environmental concerns. My problem is why can't there be a middle ground where the environment can be protected and we can still
20 comments Last Page
last by d6fer 4 months ago
The War on Work
This ARTICLE talks about all of the jobs that are available and even with the 9% unemployment rate are still not being filled. W
4 comments
last by sean_renaud 6 months ago
Will we get a tax cut?
There's a battle waging in Washington. Democrats want to pass a payroll tax cut for the middle class. Republicans refuse to pass it without adding poison pills. They have passed it combined with the keystone XL pipeline project. Starchini has blogged ab
15 comments
last by sean_renaud 5 months ago

Remember me

New? Sign up here.
sean_renaud commented about 13 hours ago on
ATTN MEN ... and ladies
And now it's subjective I see. Still you've been oddly quiet. Tis hard to come to compromises when oneside is read the rest
sean_renaud commented about 14 hours ago on
ATTN MEN ... and ladies
Of course we lie. We've been trained and trained well. Also am I the only one seeing ALIENated in regular font? Anybody got a clue how he dumpd the God from above font or how I can get read the rest
sean_renaud commented 1 day ago on
We should get back to basics
It's considerably more complicated than that even. There are certain things you can't make a profit doing, certainly not in the traditional free market where competition drives people to perform. Sewers,water distribution, trash collecting, hell read the rest
sean_renaud commented 1 day ago on
We should get back to basics
I never once denied that a mixed system works better. You're the one who constantly attempts to deny it. If however as you say capitalism shows people a river and gets out of the way what is the proper response when someone gets rich, damns up the read the rest
sean_renaud commented 2 days ago on
Where the deficit comes from
Every president should do that, and probably read the rest
sean_renaud commented 2 days ago on
Just a Few Billion Earth like Planets Out There.
Interesting article. It's kind of impossible to separate God (as in the Abrahamic God) from science. The Bible is in direct contradiction with science on a great many things. However scientists studying the universe aren't sitting around trying to read the rest
sean_renaud commented 2 days ago on
Our Unbelievable President
Wait. . .Obama can't even run on his record? You're official stance is that he should either a) claim he's the messiah and that he's not standing on the shoulders of giants or b) pay no attention to the things he's working on or has read the rest
sean_renaud commented 3 days ago on
You can't handle the truth.
Is this one of those things where I'm supposed to keep turning up the volume to try and hear it and something scary read the rest
sean_renaud commented 3 days ago on
This Obama's Gay Marriage Change Help Him?
There might be some polls that say that. They must be incredibly biased however. [These guys are telling me that Obama is pulling away.](http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/05/16/fox-news-poll-obama-pulls-ahead-romney-as-presidential-race-heats-up/) read the rest